This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Feedback on draft-07: Work in progress #168
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These will be the "draft-07" documents. They will be modified in a subsequent commit to clearly indicate that they are for review only, and not for use. The "WIP-" prefix hopefully also clues people in that there is something unusual going on here. Doing everything possible (in this and the next commit) to make it clear that these are not published files, but rather are pre-built review copies for those who are unlikely to build their own from the github repo.
Put big honking warnings in the title, and name the documents draft-WORK-IN-PROGRESS-json-schema[-*]-NN and similarly change the schema identifiers. These are obviously not real draft or meta-schema names.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Let's advertise this on the site, and put up the sort of guide to changes that everyone pestered me for last time.
I'm going to go ahead and merge this to start the review period, as I ran the general idea by @Relequestual this morning. He is not responsible for any bad choices in the specifics, though!