Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

handrews
Copy link
Contributor

We really want to drive people towards projects supporting (or working towards supporting) the new drafts. Also, many of the draft-04-only projects are dead or on life support.

Projects supporting only draft-03 and earlier have been dropped entirely (a few validators, and a lorem ipsum generator).

Editors and UI generators still need splitting- I'm just tired of trying to sort out draft support for now and don't want this to stall for months again (this is the third time I've tried to do this) so I'll do that later.

handrews added 5 commits May 10, 2018 09:58
* draft-06+ vs draft-04
* Projects supporting only draft-03 and earlier dropped
* Put most recent draft first in each list
Since the "modern" data set focuses on draft-06+, make a note
of where progress towards that support can be tracked for projects
that are actively working towards it.  We do not want to penalize
in-progress work, we only want to separate out projects that
are either explicitly refusing to move past draft-04, abandoned,
or just hoping someone new shows up and adds support without any
active plan to do so.
In some cases, this is a bit of an odd fit, so some notion of
being "compatible" with recent drafts is used.

UI and editors still need splitting.

A few projects supporting only draft-03 were dropped entirely.
@Relequestual
Copy link
Member

I intend to look at this before end of wc 14th! I approve of the principal!

@handrews
Copy link
Contributor Author

Talked wih @Relequestual and @awwright, concept approved, merging to continue with improvements.

@handrews handrews merged commit f863540 into json-schema-org:master May 11, 2018
@handrews handrews deleted the split-by-draft branch May 22, 2018 02:09
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants