You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<pid="rfc.section.6.3.p.1">The value of "exclusiveMaximum" MUST be number, representing an exclusive upper limit for a numeric instance. </p>
658
658
<pid="rfc.section.6.3.p.2">If the instance is a number, then the instance is valid only if it has a value strictly less than (not equal to) "exclusiveMaximum". </p>
<pid="rfc.section.6.4.p.1">The value of "minimum" MUST be a number, representing an inclusive upper limit for a numeric instance. </p>
660
+
<pid="rfc.section.6.4.p.1">The value of "minimum" MUST be a number, representing an inclusive lower limit for a numeric instance. </p>
661
661
<pid="rfc.section.6.4.p.2">If the instance is a number, then this keyword validates only if the instance is greater than or exactly equal to "minimum". </p>
<pid="rfc.section.6.5.p.1">The value of "exclusiveMinimum" MUST be number, representing an exclusive upper limit for a numeric instance. </p>
663
+
<pid="rfc.section.6.5.p.1">The value of "exclusiveMinimum" MUST be number, representing an exclusive lower limit for a numeric instance. </p>
664
664
<pid="rfc.section.6.5.p.2">If the instance is a number, then the instance is valid only if it has a value strictly greater than (not equal to) "exclusiveMinimum". </p>
0 commit comments