Skip to content

Commit 95ed21c

Browse files
authored
Fixed minimum & exclusiveMinimum docs
1 parent a3507a0 commit 95ed21c

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

latest/json-schema-validation.html

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -657,10 +657,10 @@ <h1 id="rfc.section.6.3"><a href="#rfc.section.6.3">6.3.</a> exclusiveMaximum</h
657657
<p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.1">The value of "exclusiveMaximum" MUST be number, representing an exclusive upper limit for a numeric instance. </p>
658658
<p id="rfc.section.6.3.p.2">If the instance is a number, then the instance is valid only if it has a value strictly less than (not equal to) "exclusiveMaximum". </p>
659659
<h1 id="rfc.section.6.4"><a href="#rfc.section.6.4">6.4.</a> minimum</h1>
660-
<p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.1">The value of "minimum" MUST be a number, representing an inclusive upper limit for a numeric instance. </p>
660+
<p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.1">The value of "minimum" MUST be a number, representing an inclusive lower limit for a numeric instance. </p>
661661
<p id="rfc.section.6.4.p.2">If the instance is a number, then this keyword validates only if the instance is greater than or exactly equal to "minimum". </p>
662662
<h1 id="rfc.section.6.5"><a href="#rfc.section.6.5">6.5.</a> exclusiveMinimum</h1>
663-
<p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.1">The value of "exclusiveMinimum" MUST be number, representing an exclusive upper limit for a numeric instance. </p>
663+
<p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.1">The value of "exclusiveMinimum" MUST be number, representing an exclusive lower limit for a numeric instance. </p>
664664
<p id="rfc.section.6.5.p.2">If the instance is a number, then the instance is valid only if it has a value strictly greater than (not equal to) "exclusiveMinimum". </p>
665665
<h1 id="rfc.section.6.6"><a href="#rfc.section.6.6">6.6.</a> maxLength</h1>
666666
<p id="rfc.section.6.6.p.1">The value of this keyword MUST be a non-negative integer.</p>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)