Skip to content

Commit 89d3246

Browse files
author
John Criswell
committed
Mark these as failing on sparc instead of sparcv9.
The configure script no longer tells us that we're configuring for SparcV9 specifically. 2004-06-17-UnorderedCompares may work on SparcV8, but it's experiental anyway. 2005-02-20-AggregateSAVEEXPR should fail on any Solaris machine, as Solaris doesn't provide complex number support. llvm-svn: 24155
1 parent 53bd0b0 commit 89d3246

File tree

2 files changed

+2
-2
lines changed

2 files changed

+2
-2
lines changed

llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-06-17-UnorderedCompares.c.tr

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
11
// RUN: %llvmgcc -xc -std=c99 %s -c -o - | llvm-dis | grep -v llvm.isunordered | not grep call
2-
// XFAIL: sparcv9|ia64
2+
// XFAIL: sparc|ia64
33

44
#include <math.h>
55

llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-02-20-AggregateSAVEEXPR.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
66
// We could modify the test to use only GCC extensions, but I don't know if
77
// that would change the nature of the test.
88
//
9-
// XFAIL: sparcv9
9+
// XFAIL: sparc
1010

1111
#include <complex.h>
1212

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)