v3.2: Move a paragraph, unchanged, to make more sense in multipart encoding

src/oas.md

@@ -1792,14 +1792,14 @@ Implementations MAY choose to offer media type sniffing ([[SNIFF]]) as an altern
 
 ###### `Content-Transfer-Encoding` and `contentEncoding`
 
-Note also that `Content-Transfer-Encoding` is deprecated for `multipart/form-data` ([RFC7578](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7578.html#section-4.7)) where binary data is supported, as it is in HTTP.
-
 Using `contentEncoding` for a multipart field is equivalent to specifying an [Encoding Object](#encoding-object) with a `headers` field containing `Content-Transfer-Encoding` with a schema that requires the value used in `contentEncoding`.
 If `contentEncoding` is used for a multipart field that has an Encoding Object with a `headers` field containing `Content-Transfer-Encoding` with a schema that disallows the value from `contentEncoding`, the result is undefined for serialization and parsing.
 
 Note that as stated in [Working with Binary Data](#working-with-binary-data), if the Encoding Object's `contentType`, whether set explicitly or implicitly through its default value rules, disagrees with the `contentMediaType` in a Schema Object, the `contentMediaType` SHALL be ignored.
 Because of this, and because the Encoding Object's `contentType` defaulting rules do not take the Schema Object's`contentMediaType` into account, the use of `contentMediaType` with an Encoding Object is NOT RECOMMENDED.
 
+Note also that `Content-Transfer-Encoding` is deprecated for `multipart/form-data` ([RFC7578](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7578.html#section-4.7)) where binary data is supported, as it is in HTTP.
+
 See [Appendix E](#appendix-e-percent-encoding-and-form-media-types) for a detailed examination of percent-encoding concerns for form media types.
 
 ###### Example: Basic Multipart Form