-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
[WebAssembly] Add fold support for dot #151775
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ | ||
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5 | ||
; RUN: llc < %s -mattr=+simd128 | FileCheck %s | ||
|
||
target triple = "wasm32-unknown-unknown" | ||
|
||
define <4 x i32> @dot_sext_1(<8 x i16> %a, <8 x i16> %b) { | ||
; CHECK-LABEL: dot_sext_1: | ||
; CHECK: .functype dot_sext_1 (v128, v128) -> (v128) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0: | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.dot_i16x8_s | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # fallthrough-return | ||
%sext1 = sext <8 x i16> %a to <8 x i32> | ||
%sext2 = sext <8 x i16> %b to <8 x i32> | ||
%mul = mul <8 x i32> %sext1, %sext2 | ||
%shuffle1 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2, i32 4, i32 6> | ||
%shuffle2 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 5, i32 7> | ||
%res = add <4 x i32> %shuffle1, %shuffle2 | ||
ret <4 x i32> %res | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
||
define <4 x i32> @dot_sext_2(<8 x i16> %a, <8 x i16> %b) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Out of curiosity can you also add a test case where we dot product one vector with itself? If it doesn't match that's ok, it doesn't need to be addressed in this PR |
||
; CHECK-LABEL: dot_sext_2: | ||
; CHECK: .functype dot_sext_2 (v128, v128) -> (v128) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0: | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.dot_i16x8_s | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # fallthrough-return | ||
%sext1 = sext <8 x i16> %a to <8 x i32> | ||
%sext2 = sext <8 x i16> %b to <8 x i32> | ||
%mul = mul <8 x i32> %sext1, %sext2 | ||
%shuffle1 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2, i32 4, i32 6> | ||
%shuffle2 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 5, i32 7> | ||
%res = add <4 x i32> %shuffle2, %shuffle1 | ||
ret <4 x i32> %res | ||
} | ||
|
||
define <4 x i32> @dot_zext(<8 x i16> %a, <8 x i16> %b) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nit, can you add a comment mentioning that this is a negative test |
||
; CHECK-LABEL: dot_zext: | ||
; CHECK: .functype dot_zext (v128, v128) -> (v128) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: .local v128 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0: | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.extmul_low_i16x8_u | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.tee 2 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.extmul_high_i16x8_u | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.tee 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i8x16.shuffle 0, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 2 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i8x16.shuffle 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.add | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # fallthrough-return | ||
%zext1 = zext <8 x i16> %a to <8 x i32> | ||
%zext2 = zext <8 x i16> %b to <8 x i32> | ||
%mul = mul <8 x i32> %zext1, %zext2 | ||
%shuffle1 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2, i32 4, i32 6> | ||
%shuffle2 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, i32 5, i32 7> | ||
%res = add <4 x i32> %shuffle1, %shuffle2 | ||
ret <4 x i32> %res | ||
} | ||
|
||
define <4 x i32> @dot_wrong_shuffle(<8 x i16> %a, <8 x i16> %b) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same here, to comment that this is a negative test |
||
; CHECK-LABEL: dot_wrong_shuffle: | ||
; CHECK: .functype dot_wrong_shuffle (v128, v128) -> (v128) | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # %bb.0: | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.extmul_low_i16x8_s | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 0 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: local.get 1 | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.extmul_high_i16x8_s | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: i32x4.add | ||
; CHECK-NEXT: # fallthrough-return | ||
%sext1 = sext <8 x i16> %a to <8 x i32> | ||
%sext2 = sext <8 x i16> %b to <8 x i32> | ||
%mul = mul <8 x i32> %sext1, %sext2 | ||
%shuffle1 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3> | ||
%shuffle2 = shufflevector <8 x i32> %mul, <8 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> <i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7> | ||
%res = add <4 x i32> %shuffle1, %shuffle2 | ||
ret <4 x i32> %res | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Move this pattern above so it's beside the other pattern for DOT?