Require approval from t-infra instead of t-release on tier bumps #144906
+9
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2025
|
r? compiler_leads |
|
Has the release team weighed in on this? I agree this conceptually makes more sense but since the original policy was the result of an RFC, I think we should do a T-release/T-infra FCP to confirm this is what both teams want. |
|
I asked Mark, who was fine with it (along with most members of t-infra), but yeah, we should probably involve the whole release team. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Discussed at https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/Tier.201.20target.20promotion.20RFC.20FCP.20sign-offs/with/532735844.
I also changed "viability and value" to just "viability". I think that t-infra should decide whether it's viable to support a given target on our CI. The value should be determined by t-compiler.
r? @jieyouxu