Skip to content

Add support for ty::Instance path shortening in diagnostics #144914

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@estebank estebank commented Aug 4, 2025

Make ty::Instance able to use short_string and usable in structured errors directly. Remove some ad-hoc type shortening logic.

Replace ad-hoc type path shortening logic for recursive mono instantiation errors to use `tcx.short_string()` instead.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 4, 2025

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 4, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 4, 2025

This PR modifies tests/ui/issues/. If this PR is adding new tests to tests/ui/issues/,
please refrain from doing so, and instead add it to more descriptive subdirectories.

@estebank estebank changed the title Add support for ty::Instance path shortening Add support for ty::Instance path shortening in diagnostics Aug 4, 2025
@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2025

📌 Commit ed819cc has been approved by fee1-dead

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 5, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #143857 (Port #[macro_export] to the new attribute parsing infrastructure)
 - #144133 (Stabilize const TypeId::of)
 - #144369 (Upgrade semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros from warn to deny)
 - #144443 (Make target pointer width in target json an integer)
 - #144473 (Address libunwind.a inconsistency issues in the bootstrap program)
 - #144659 (bootstrap: refactor mingw dist and fix gnullvm)
 - #144682 (Stabilize `strict_overflow_ops`)
 - #144794 (Port `#[coroutine]` to the new attribute system)
 - #144835 (Anonymize binders in tail call sig)
 - #144836 (Change visibility of Args new function)
 - #144900 (Stabilize `unsigned_signed_diff` feature)
 - #144903 (Rename `begin_panic_handler` to `panic_handler`)
 - #144910 (Add regression tests for seemingly fixed issues)
 - #144926 (Correct the use of `must_use` on btree::IterMut)
 - #144928 (Drop `rust-version` from `rustc_thread_pool`)
 - #144931 ([win][arm64ec] Fix msvc-wholearchive for Arm64EC)

Failed merges:

 - #144914 (Add support for `ty::Instance` path shortening in diagnostics)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Aug 5, 2025

Unfortunately this has merge conflicts.
@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants